Academic Misconduct

Academic Misconduct Policy

You can view the University's full Academic Misconduct Policy .

Below are some important FAQs that may help you.

What is Academic Misconduct?

“Academic misconduct is deemed to cover all deliberate attempt(s) to gain an unfair advantage in assessments. This includes cheating, plagiarism, unauthorised collusion or any other deliberate attempt to gain an unfair advantage in summatively assessed work” (Academic Misconduct Policy 2018).

Examples of Academic Misconduct

  • Cheating: Using unauthorised materials during an exam, falsifying data, using mobile phones, or submitting work from third-party services such as “essay mills”.
  • Plagiarism: Copying another person’s work and presenting it as your own.
  • Collusion: Collaborating with one or more students without official approval.
  • Artificial Intelligence Misuse: Using AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) in assessments without permission, leading to an unfair advantage.
     

What is the Panel?

The Academic Misconduct Panel (AMP) consists of three academic staff members, at least two of whom will not be significantly known to you. There will also be a note taker, the academic staff member who has brought the allegation forward, yourself, and a friend or JMSU representative.

What will happen at the Panel?

The allegation will be stated, and questions will be asked in regard to this. You will then state your case – you may also be asked questions. You and your presenting officers will be asked to leave. You will then be given the outcome within 5 working days by letter.

What to consider for your statement to the Panel?

It is advised to submit a written statement to the panel. Highlight how you researched and structured your work, your understanding of the allegation, and if you have been taught about misconduct during your time at university. If applicable, explain the intent behind using another’s work and what you will do to ensure that academic misconduct doesn’t happen in future. Be honest and clear about your actions.

The University uses a points-based tariff when an allegation of academic misconduct is proven. The penalty recommendation is sent to the Board of Examiners and applied. If the penalty allows for a referral, and you still have a referral opportunity left, you will be able to redo the assessment – though it will be capped at the module pass mark.

How can I appeal the outcome?

If the allegation is proven against you, you have the right to appeal the outcome. Depending on the outcome, you will have to follow one of the two appeal routes:

  1. Appealing the decision of the AMP where the recommendation is not expulsion.
    1. You have 10 working days from the formal notification of the outcome from the AMP to submit the Academic and Academic Misconduct Appeals form .
  2. Appealing the decision of the AMP where the recommendation is expulsion.
    1. You have 10 working days from the formal decision letter following the approval of the vice-chancellor. The appeal is a statement from yourself stating which grounds the appeal is based on. For example, if the process wasn’t followed correctly or you believe the outcome was unreasonable. You can read the University’s Appeal against Expulsion procedure and determine if you have grounds for the appeal.

If your appeal is deemed eligible, you will attend an Expulsion Appeal Panel (EAP). It will consist of the chair of the panel – a member of the Board of Governors, a member of university staff representing the Academic Board, and the President of JMSU or a nominee from their sabbatical officers.

Get in Touch